London Futurists
The 4 Cs of Superintelligence
The 4 Cs of Superintelligence is a framework that casts fresh light on the vexing question of possible outcomes of humanity's interactions with an emerging superintelligent AI. The 4 Cs are Cease, Control, Catastrophe, and Consent. In this episode, the show's co-hosts, Calum Chace and David Wood, debate the pros and cons of the first two of these Cs, and lay the groundwork for a follow-up discussion of the pros and cons of the remaining two.
Topics addressed in this episode include:
*) Reasons why superintelligence might never be created
*) Timelines for the arrival of superintelligence have been compressed
*) Does the unpredictability of superintelligence mean we shouldn't try to consider its arrival in advance?
*) Two "big bangs" have caused dramatic progress in AI; what might the next such breakthrough bring?
*) The flaws in the "Level zero futurist" position
*) Two analogies contrasted: overcrowding on Mars , and travelling to Mars without knowing what we'll breathe when we'll get there
*) A startling illustration of the dramatic power of exponential growth
*) A concern for short-term risk is by no means a reason to pay less attention to longer-term risks
*) Why the "Cease" option is looking more credible nowadays than it did a few years ago
*) Might "Cease" become a "Plan B" option?
*) Examples of political dictators who turned away from acquiring or using various highly risky weapons
*) Challenges facing a "Turing Police" who monitor for dangerous AI developments
*) If a superintelligence has agency (volition), it seems that "Control" is impossible
*) Ideas for designing superintelligence without agency or volition
*) Complications with emergent sub-goals (convergent instrumental goals)
*) A badly configured superintelligent coffee fetcher
*) Bad actors may add agency to a superintelligence, thinking it will boost its performance
*) The possibility of changing social incentives to reduce the dangers of people becoming bad actors
*) What's particularly hard about both "Cease" and "Control" is that they would need to remain in place forever
*) Human civilisations contain many diametrically opposed goals
*) Going beyond the statement of "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" to a starting point for aligning AI with human values?
*) A cliff-hanger ending
The survey "Key open questions about the transition to AGI" can be found at https://transpolitica.org/projects/key-open-questions-about-the-transition-to-agi/
Music: Spike Protein, by Koi Discovery, available under CC0 1.0 Public Domain Declaration
Delivered is your window in the minds of people behind successful digital products.
Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify
The 4 Cs of Superintelligence is a framework that casts fresh light on the vexing question of possible outcomes of humanity's interactions with an emerging superintelligent AI. The 4 Cs are Cease, Control, Catastrophe, and Consent. In this episode, the show's co-hosts, Calum Chace and David Wood, debate the pros and cons of the first two of these Cs, and lay the groundwork for a follow-up discussion of the pros and cons of the remaining two.
Topics addressed in this episode include:
*) Reasons why superintelligence might never be created
*) Timelines for the arrival of superintelligence have been compressed
*) Does the unpredictability of superintelligence mean we shouldn't try to consider its arrival in advance?
*) Two "big bangs" have caused dramatic progress in AI; what might the next such breakthrough bring?
*) The flaws in the "Level zero futurist" position
*) Two analogies contrasted: overcrowding on Mars , and travelling to Mars without knowing what we'll breathe when we'll get there
*) A startling illustration of the dramatic power of exponential growth
*) A concern for short-term risk is by no means a reason to pay less attention to longer-term risks
*) Why the "Cease" option is looking more credible nowadays than it did a few years ago
*) Might "Cease" become a "Plan B" option?
*) Examples of political dictators who turned away from acquiring or using various highly risky weapons
*) Challenges facing a "Turing Police" who monitor for dangerous AI developments
*) If a superintelligence has agency (volition), it seems that "Control" is impossible
*) Ideas for designing superintelligence without agency or volition
*) Complications with emergent sub-goals (convergent instrumental goals)
*) A badly configured superintelligent coffee fetcher
*) Bad actors may add agency to a superintelligence, thinking it will boost its performance
*) The possibility of changing social incentives to reduce the dangers of people becoming bad actors
*) What's particularly hard about both "Cease" and "Control" is that they would need to remain in place forever
*) Human civilisations contain many diametrically opposed goals
*) Going beyond the statement of "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" to a starting point for aligning AI with human values?
*) A cliff-hanger ending
The survey "Key open questions about the transition to AGI" can be found at https://transpolitica.org/projects/key-open-questions-about-the-transition-to-agi/
Music: Spike Protein, by Koi Discovery, available under CC0 1.0 Public Domain Declaration
Delivered is your window in the minds of people behind successful digital products.
Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify